I've been away from the blogging world lately. It's been quite a while since my last substantial post. The past two posts were little tiny blurbs, and you might have been able to tell that my heart wasn't really in them. So why am I devoting time to a post now? I just got out of a
relationship......with my thesis.
It's been a rocky relationship, full of ups and downs. Late nights of passionate fury in the library followed by the overwhelming desire to rip my hair out and cry. But now, it's finally (almost) over. Sure there'll be some fleeting reunions and revisions, but the first draft is finished and it's no longer the most earth-shattering thing in my life.
Now, as would any girl who just dumped/got dumped by her beau, I'm going to spend the next several paragraphs talking about my thesis. I'll try to make it interesting.
The title of my thesis is "Application of Anthropological Aging Techniques to Three-Dimensional Reconstructions of Clinical CT Scans of the Adult Pelvis" (I know it's an awkward title, but I can't help it--academia loves the prepositional phrase). Confused? I'll try to break it down. Forensic anthropologists can tell how old a person is/was by looking at features on the pelvis. However, if there are still fleshy bits attached or the person is still alive, one can't access the bones. With computer software, anthropologists can build a 3D skeleton from CT scan data. The focus of my study is to see if anthropologists can see the features on the 3D image to give an accurate age estimate as well as if they were looking at the actual bone. In case you were wondering, it works about 80% of the time, which is decent for a pilot study.
The bittersweet thing about writing a thesis is that you're spending all of this time to write an 85-ish page book that essentially, only two people (your committee) are going to read. This means that either I can put no charm or personality into it (because, why bother?) or I can make it dangerously entertaining for any poor soul who does decide to read it in the future. A few examples...
In any research about the pelvis, who can resist the phrase, "the thrust of this research..."?
"The findings based on So-and-so et al.'s (YEAR) method were promising, however, Such-and-such et al. (YEAR) stated that So-and-so et al.'s method essentially sucked, and so these results probably don't really mean all that much."
"The age ranges in this graph are approximate, as they are based upon the whiskers of box-and-whisker plots presented in So-and-so et al.'s YEAR paper. Why So-and-so et al. (YEAR) thought that box-and-whisker plots were a good idea and was apparently too busy to publish the actual age ranges instead of making me sit here with a ruler trying to figure out if the line is closer to halfway between 20 and 40 or 1/3 of the way between 20 and 40 is beyond me."
And I'm so tempted to include this footnote that would be the best academic double entendre ever...maybe after it's approved and nobody has to read it again.
At any rate, my thesis has been an interesting experience. I think I've grown a lot from it. There's a sense of accomplishment that comes from creating and completing something that's so enormous--seriously, it's going to be close to 100 pages when it's finally done and revised. It was awesome, but having it be over is even more amazing. Now that the weight of this gigantic looming thing is off my shoulders, I'm in a much better mood all of the time, even so much that for a few days, my face hurt from all the smiling.
Not bad for a lady on the rebound.